|
 |
Harry Stevens (on
23/07/2008)
said: "The hotel was what I expected for the money - it was clean and tidy. Generally good value for money"
|
|
|
Tessa Patey (on
25/06/2008 10:09:00)
said: "Perfect location for us, going to a wedding just a 5 minute walk away.... really great value for money and friendly service. Is a bit like stepping back into the 1970`s but we felt that was part of its charm! Would definitely stay again for 1 or 2 night's maybe."
|
|
|
Dave Browne (on
27/04/2008 11:29:00)
said: "Old-fashioned hotel, in a time-warp. But reasonably clean and pleasant, in an area where there are few decent hotels. Staff friendly. Traffic outside noisy until midnight."
|
|
|
Private (on
23/02/2008 19:49:00)
said: "This hotel is old, but beautiful. If you want a clean and a 21st century hotel go somewhere else. If you want to know the life of the Sidcup Londoners, enjoy the seventies and see the humour of this place, go there, it is cheap, warm and
We got a box of chocolates when we left. All this means that we enjoyed it very much indeed. I am going to have a warm shower now, because I did not have one for 3 days. It was an excellent experience.
"
|
|
|
Jeanette Payling (on
08/02/2008 14:48:00)
said: "Although it was not myself staying but two of our workforce, they reported that there were toenail cuttings in the bed sheets and dribble/saliva on the pillowslips. The bedding had obviously not been changed from the previous occupiers of the room. Our workforce checked in after working all day and therefore, there had been sufficient time in which to carry this task out before they occupied the room. Needless, to say, we will not be using the Toronto again."
|
|
|
Janice Harrow (on
12/12/2007 21:24:00)
said: "En-suite was very, very poor. Beds very hard and uncomfortable. Lack of plugs and mirrors. Not enough cups for each person in room. Very old fashioned and in need of update and refurbishment to make customers stay comfortable and pleasant."
|
|
|
Private (on
26/07/2007 07:49:00)
said: "Stayed in hotel annexe a couple of doors away. The room was noisy from traffic directly outside, doors banging and people moving around upstairs sometimes feeling they were coming through ceiling.
The breakfast was disappointing as the bacon looked like it had been out all week!
The staff were friendly and helpful if I was looking for a positive!"
|
|
|
Lucy Smith (on
01/03/2007 08:42:00)
said: "This hotel is run by a very charming and friendly elderly couple, assisted by a foreign guy who at first seemed a bit lacking in manners or charm but I realised later it was partly a cultural thing and actually he was quite nice.
First impressions were `Oh My God` what the hell am I doing here as it really is stuck in a 1970s time warp and definately looked better in the pictures on the website. I was pretty disappointed at first with my room having asked for a non smoking room to find it smelled of smoke when I walked in, and had an ash tray next to the bed. To watch tv and boil the kettle at the same time meant lifting the kettle up and plugging into the only other available power socket on other side of room. Or you unplugged the tv in order to put the kettle on. On plus side bed was comfy and room was very clean!!
En suite would be a little misleading as basically it was a cupboard attached to the room which was just big enough to house a toilet and a shower. No room to swin"
|
|
|
Angela Young (on
15/02/2007 22:22:00)
said: "I don`t excpect much for £50 for a night in a hotel, but the beds were extremley uncomfortable and the pillows were also really hard (and heavy) and due to this it was difficult to sleep right through the night, which may I add was very cold. I had a very big day so I really could have benifited from a good nights sleep, it just didn`t happen. Breakfast was really nice, and the hotel staff were nice it`s just a shame the rest of it was a bit of a nightmare. I wouldn`t stay again, nor would I reccomend it to anyone else."
|
